Authors
- Berezhkovskaya Elena Lvovna
- Kravtsov Lev Gennadyevich PhD in Psychology
Annotation
The article compares the indicators of socio-psychological adaptation, the level of subjective control and the subjectivity among college and university students.
All students studied in the specialty «adaptive physical education».
Purpose — to identify, comprehend and describe the differences between 1st and 3rd year college students, as well as 1st year university students with regard to their socio-psychological adaptability, subjectivity and level of subjective control.
Methodology and methods: Theoretical analysis, standard psychometric methods, statistical analysis of the reliability of differences in quantitative results using the Mann-
Whitney U test.
The main results of the study. It was found that the indicators of the level of socio-psychological adaptation and subjectivity among college freshmen are significantly lower than among third-year students and university students. It was also found that according to the indicators of the level of subjective control, all college students, both 1 and 3 years old, have significantly lower indicators than 1 year university students after graduation. The conclusion is made about the different nature of adaptation in these two categories of young people. Adaptation occurs in both cases, but in college students the level of subjective control does not change.
Practical relevance. The results obtained in the study can serve as a support for the design of a developing educational environment within the framework of the SPE system, aimed at increasing the subjectivity and internality of college students.
How to link insert
Berezhkovskaya, E. L. & Kravtsov, L. G. (2022). Socio-psychological adaptation and the level of subjective control in students obtaining secondary professional and higher education Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №1 (1),
References
1.
1. Alexandrov, D. A., Tenisheva K. A., & Savelyeva S. S. (2015). Mobility without risks: the educational path “to the university through college”. Educational Studies Moscow, 3, 66–91. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Alexandrova, N. A. (2010). Family factors of professional self-determination in adolescence. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 4, 140–145. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Greben’, N. F. (2008). Psychological tests for professionals. Minsk: Modern school. 496 p. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Ermoshin, V. I. (2007). Approaches to professional self-determination of students of secondary vocational education. New pedagogical research. 3, 70–73.
(In Russ.).
5.
5. Karabanova, O. A. (2016). Child-parental relations as a factor of professional self-determination of personality in adolescence and youth. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 14. Psychology, 3, 54–62. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Kashirsky, D. V. (2021). Method for diagnosing subjectivity by M. V. Isakov: Assessment of construct validity and reliability on a sample of students in grades 8–11. K. D. Ushinsky and National Education: Materials of the XXV Interregional Pedagogical Readings (p. 112–114). Moscow: MCU. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Kislykh, A. A. (2018) Dynamics of students’ subjectivity indicators. Azimuth of scientific research, 3 (24), 313–316. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Kon, I. S. (1989) Psychology of early adolescence. Moscow: Education. 256 p. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Konstantinovsky, D. L., & Popova, E. S. (2018) Russian secondary vocational education: demand and specificity of choice. Sociological research, 3, 34–44. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Maltseva, V. A., & Shabalin, A. I. (2021). The Non-Bypass trajectory, or the boom in demand for TVET in Russia. Education Issues. Educational Studies
Moscow, 2, 10–42. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Mudrik, A. V. (2004). Socialization of a person. Tutorial. Moscow: Academy. 304 p. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Myskin, S. V., & Makeeva, G. A. (2021). Adaptive aspects of the social situation of the development of adolescents in the conditions of training in the organization of secondary vocational education. Psychological and pedagogical research. MGPPU, 13 (2), 89–104. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Myasnikova, O. V. (2019). Subjectivity in the learning process: Monograph. Barnaul. 97 p. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Osnitsky, A. K. (2004). Determination of the characteristics of social adaptation. Psychology and school, 1, 43–56. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Sobkin, V. S., Abrosimova, Z. B., Adamchuk, D. V., & Baranova, E. V. (2005). Teenager: norms, risks, deviations. Works on the sociology of education. Vol. X. Iss. XVII. Moscow: Center for Sociology of Education, Russian Academy of Education. 359 p. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Fetiskin, N. P., Kozlov, V. V., & Manuilov, G. M. (2002). Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups (p. 193–197). Moscow: Institute of Psychotherapy. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Havenson, T. E., & Chirkina, T. A. (2019). Educational choice of students after the 9th and 11th grades: a comparison of the primary and secondary effects of the socio-economic situation of the family. Journal of Social Policy Research, 17 (4), 539–554. (In Russ.).