Home → Releases → № 2 (10) →

The influence of the artistic and creative environment formed by the style of the era on traditional applied art in the context of teaching the discipline «History of Art»

Content Update SPO , UDC: 377.3.016:745 DOI: 10.25688/2782-6597.2024.10.2.1

Authors

  • Medkova Elena Stoyanovna PhD of Pedagogy

Annotation

The article examines the problem of the influence on traditional applied arts and crafts of the artistic and creative environment formed by the style of the era, which should be taken into account in teaching at art colleges in the direction 54.02.02 «Decorative and applied arts and folk crafts». The purpose of the article: to describe the results of a study undertaken to improve the quality of secondary vocational education, the purpose of which was to determine specific mechanisms of interaction between the basic archetypal core of the artistic form of traditional applied art and the influence of current style-forming models that create an appropriate stimulating artistic and creative environment. Methodology and methods. In defining general concepts in the field of traditional applied art and historical styles, culturological (N. G. Mikhailova, I. Hassan) and structural-semantic approaches (A. F. Losev, V. N. Toporov, K. G. Jung). In the study of stylistic connections, methods of stylistic analysis were used (T. G. Malinina, N. V. Filicheva). Among specific studies of the Gzhel fishery, we relied on the works of Soviet (R. R. Musin, A. B. Saltykov) and modern Russian authors (T. L. Astrakhantseva, V. V. Nikonov). Еру main results of the study. A hypothesis is substantiated about the role of prototypes that are basic to the Russian cultural tradition in the process of periodic renewal of traditional crafts. The mechanisms of the relationship between traditional culture and different style models that create the appropriate artistic and creative environment at the level of prototypes are considered. The role of style in the form of a semantic field of the artistic and creative environment for the development of traditional crafts is emphasized. Using the example of the restoration of the Gzhel craft, the mechanism of self-tuning of masters of traditional art in the situation of choosing from competing stylistic directions of the 20th century, in favor of the direction that coincides with the matriarchal archetype, is shown. Scientific novelty of the research: it is substantiated that the Gzhel craft, updated during the experiment by N. I. Bessarabova, belongs to the style of Art Deco and postmodernism at the level of attitude to the material, form, compositional solutions, choice and interpretation of decorative imagery — the famous Gzhel rose. Practical significance. The historical experience of the experimental work of described in the article A. B. Saltykov and N. I. Bessarabova’s work on updating Gzhel crafts can be used by students of art educational institutions focused on traditional crafts when choosing their own creative path in the context of the multiplicity of stylistic trends in modern art.
Tags:
traditional arts and crafts; style; specialized art education; Gzhel crafts; national archetypes

How to link insert

Medkova, E. S. (2024). The influence of the artistic and creative environment formed by the style of the era on traditional applied art in the context of teaching the discipline «History of Art» Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (10), 6. https://doi.org/10.25688/2782-6597.2024.10.2.1
References
1. 1. Akimova, L. I. (2007). The art of Ancient Greece. Geometrics, archaic. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika. 400 p. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Astrakhantseva, T. L. (1999). The art of Gzhel majolica of the second half of the XX century. The problem of tradition and modernity. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree Candidate of Art Criticism: 17.00.05ю Moscow. 22 p. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Gorozhanina, S. V., & Kutsenko, E. V. (2015). Folk arts and crafts of the Moscow region. Podolsk: Moscow region. 255 p.
4. 4. Zenkin, K. V. (2019). The concept of artistic style in the works of A. F. Losev. In Losev, A. F. The doctrine of style (pp. 7–21). A. A. Tahoe-Godi, E. A. Tahoe-Godi (general ed. and comp.). K. V. Zenkin (Introductory article). Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Live source. Album. (2017). Moscow: Folk arts and crafts of Russia. 300 p. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Losev, A. F. (1994). The problem of artistic style. Kiev: Kiev Academy of Eurobusiness. 228 p. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Losev, A. F. (2019). The doctrine of style. A. A. Taho-Godi, E. A. Taho-Godi (General editors and compilers). K. V. Zenkin (Introductory article). Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. 456 p. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Losev, A. F. Chaos. (1982). Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia. S. A. Tokarev (Editor-in-chief). Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. 720 p. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Malinina, T. G. (2002). Art Deco style: origins, regional components, features of evolution. Abstract dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Art History: 17.00.04. Moscow. 50 p. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Medkova, E. S. (2013). Stylistic trends of the late XIX – early XX century. Symbolism, post-impressionism, modernism. Art, 1(485), 39–49. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Medkova, E. S. (2023). Innovativeness and archetypal roots of national culture as a guarantee of success in teaching traditional arts and crafts: problems of teaching in vocational education in the specialty 54.02.02 «Decorative and applied arts and folk crafts». MCU Journal Modern College, 2(6), 18–33. DOI: 10.25688/2782-6597.2023.6.2.2 (In Russ.).
12. 12. Medkova, E. S. (2018). The role of traditional culture as a carrier of the national spatial and temporal model of worldview in the development of national culture by students of different age categories. In I. E. Kashekova, S. N. Kolosova, E. A. Kononova, E. S. Medkova, etc. I. E. Kashekova (Scientific ed.). The pedagogical potential of traditional culture in the formation of spiritual and moral qualities of personality (pp. 236–238). Monograph. Moscow: IHOiK RAO. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Medkova, E. S. (2023). How It is interesting and entertaining to talk about Russian culture using the example of a matryoshka doll. School technologies, 2, 73–86. (In Russ.).
14. 14. Mikhailova, N. G. (1998). Folk culture. Culturology. XX century. Encyclopedia. In 2 volumes. St. Petersburg. University book; Aleteya. Vol. 1. Pp. 69–71. (In Russ.).
15. 15. Musina, R. R. (1985). The Art of Gzheli. Moscow: Znanie. 48 p. (In Russ.).
16. 16. Nikonov, V. V. (2021). Gzhel ceramic school in 1918–1925 in the archival documents of RGALI and TSGAMO. History and archives, 4, 115–133. (In Russ.).
17. 17. Saltykov, A. B. (1949). Gzhel ceramics. Moscow: Publishing House of the State Historical Museum. 40 p. (In Russ.).
18. 18. Saltykov, A. B. (1968). The closest art. Moscow: Enlightenment. 296 p. (In Russ.).
19. 19. Toporov, V. N. (2000). Towards the reconstruction of the Balto-Slavic mythological image of the Mother Earth *ZemŠa & *Mātē (*Mati). Balto-Slavic studies 1998–1990. XIV (pp. 239–371). Collection of scientific papers. Moscow: Indrik. (In Russ.).
20. 20. Filicheva, N. V. (2001). The processes of artistic style formation in culture of the 1900s–1930s. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree Candidate of Philosophical Sciences: 24.00.01. St. Petersburg. 20 p. (In Russ.).
21. 21. Filicheva, N. V. (2021). Signs, images, symbols and modernity of the Art Deco style. New art history, 2, 120–137. (In Russ.).
22. 22. Hassan, I. (2004). Postmodern turn. In E. A. Orlova. Cultural (social) anthropology (pp. 394–395). A textbook for universities. Moscow: Academic Project. (In Russ.).
23. 23. Jung, K. G. (2005). Soul and myth. Six archetypes. Moscow: AST; Mn: Harvest. 400 p. (In Russ.).
Download file .pdf 2.52 Mb