Authors
- Kravtsov Oleg Gennadievich Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor
Annotation
The article presents the results of a study conducted within the initiative project of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. The study was aimed at identifying
differences in ideas about cooperation between parents (legal representatives) of students and teachers of an educational organization. The author considers a typical high school situation when there are problems with the behavior of students. Under these conditions, the joint efforts of teachers and parents of the student are necessary. But such cooperation is not always possible to build. There are many reasons for this, and the author of the article sees one of such reasons as the different understanding and vision of the parties of this cooperation. The author examines five aspects of the views of the parties on such cooperation. On some sides, they are quite unanimous and coincide. And in some respects, their positions are radically different. According to the authors, these discrepancies underlie the difficulties that arise in building such cooperation between educational organizations and parents of students. The purpose of the article is to reveal the key contradictions that arise when building the interaction of educational organizations with parents (legal representatives) of high school students characterized by behavioral problems. The work was carried out in the methodology of developmental and educational psychology. The principles of scientific understanding are used in the cultural-historical approach.
In the empirical part of the study, questionnaires and statistical feedback of the results of the study are used. The article reflects the results of a study of psychological problems faced by modern high school. The author offers his own approach to understanding and defining these difficulties. The results obtained during the study can be used to make adjustments to the strategy of educational organizations to build interaction with parents (legal representatives) of students. In addition, the data obtained may be important for determining the trajectory of the professional training of teachers for such interaction.
How to link insert
Kravtsov, O. G. (2022). Study of differences in perceptions of cooperation on behavioral problems of students by parents (legal representatives) and teachers of educational organizations Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (3)_, 59. https://doi.org/10.25688/2782-6597.2022.3.3.7
References
1.
1. Artemova, V. B. (2016). Psychological characteristics of students who systematically violate academic discipline: Final qualifying work. L. S. Vygotsky Institute of Psychology, RSUH. 82 p. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Balashova, V. A. (2017). Adaptive mechanisms in business communication. New in psychological and pedagogical research, 2 (46), 80–88. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Balashova, V. A. (2016). Development of social intelligence in the context of professional qualification on the example of teachers. Science and school, 4, 180–183. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Bernadiner, M. I., Vorobyeva, N. A., Gazaryan, I. Z., Grinshkun, V. V., Knyazeva, E. N., Kondakov, A. M., ..., & Shaginyan, M. L. (2022). System of monitoring the effectiveness of education and socialization of students in educational organizations of the city of Moscow, implementing integrated educational programs that meet the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and the International Baccalaureate. Methodical Manual. Moscow: Belyj veter. (Ser. Methodical Library of schools of the International Baccalaureate of Moscow). (In Russ.).
5.
5. Vorobyeva, N. A., & Oboeva, S. V. (2022). Theoretical foundations of preschool education. Textbook for student institutions of secondary vocational education (edited by Zh. V. Plokhov). Moscow: Academy. 208 p. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Kravtsov, O. G. (2019). The problem of creativity in the context of the study of deviant behavior. Psychological and pedagogical research, 11, 1, 85–92 (In Russ.).
7.
7. Kravtsov, O. G. (2017). Psychological problems of students’ compliance with academic discipline in the process of socialization. Social pedagogy in Russia. Scientific and methodological journal, 6, 26–33. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Kravtsova, E. E. (2015). The development of L. S. Vygotsky’s ideas in modern educational practice. Bulletin of the Russian State University. Ser.: Psychology and pedagogy of education, 14, 9–15. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Mukhina, V. S. (1999). Age psychology: phenomenology of development, childhood, adolescence. Textbook for students universities (4th ed., ster.). Moscow: Academy. 456 p. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 16.06.2014 No. 658 (ed. dated 14.02.2018) ‟On Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Socio-psychological Testing of Persons Studying in General Education Organizations and Professional Educational Organizations, as Well as in educational institutions of Higher education” [Electronic resource]. Legalacts.ru: laws, codes and regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.). Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://legalacts.ru/doc/prikaz-minobrnauki-rossii-ot-16062014-n-658/
11.
11. Soboleva, M. O. (2013). Psychological conditions of changing attitudes to learning among adolescents. PhD Dissertation of Psychological Sciences (specialty 19.00.01 “General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology”). Moscow. 235 p. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Feldstein, D. I. (1999). Psychology of growing up: structural and substantive characteristics of the process of personality development. Selected works. Moscow Psychological and Social Institute. Moscow: Flinta. 670 p. (In Russ.).