Authors
- Levchenko Yurievna Yurievna Doctor of Psychology, Professor
Annotation
The article presents the characteristics of students with a NODE and highlights the issues of professional orientation of those students who do not have intellectual
disabilities and are trained in AOOP options 6.1 and 6.2. The author writes about the presence of inadequate professional intentions of a student with a NODE, as well as
the bias of parental attitudes. The article also describes the stages of career guidance work with young people with motor disabilities. The purpose of the article: to familiarize readers with the problems of professional choice of students with motor disorders. Methodology and methods: A personality-oriented approach to the diagnosis and correction of professional intentions. Author’s methods of studying professional intentions. The main results of the study. The features of the professional choice of students with motor disorders and the ways of career guidance work with them are shown. Scientific novelty. Information about the features of the professional choice of persons with motor pathology is presented for the first time. Practical significance. Recommendations for career guidance and professional consulting work can be used by practitioners.
How to link insert
Levchenko, Y. Y. (2022). Some questions of professional orientation of students from the NODE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (2), 38. https://doi.org/10.25688/2782-6597.2022.2.2.4
References
1.
1. Huseynova, A. A. (2016). Special conditions for obtaining education for students with severe (multiple) developmental disorders. Problems of the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard for children with disabilities. Collection of articles based on materials of the round table (сomp. by I. Yu. Levchenko, A. S. Pavlova, & M. V. Sheshukov). S. 47–54. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Kovalev, V. V. (1979). Psychiatry of childhood (a guide for doctors). Moscow: Medicine. 607 p. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Levchenko, I. Yu., Prikhodko, O. G., Huseynova, A. A., & Manuilova, V. V. (2018). Inclusive education: special conditions for the inclusion of students with disabilities in the educational space. Textbook. Moscow: National Book Center. 110 p. (Special psychology). (In Russ.).
4.
4. Levchenko, I. Yu. (2019). Personal aspects of professional orientation of high school students with disabilities. Continuous inclusive education: theory, history, methodology. Materials of the XI International Theoretical and Methodological Seminar (pp. 165–171). (In Russ.).
5.
5. Leonhard, E. I., Samsonova, E. G., & Ivanova, E. A. (2018). Normalization of conditions for the upbringing and education of children with disabilities in the context of inclusive education. Methodological guide. Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University. Moscow. 278 p. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Nazarova, N. M. (2008). Special Pedagogy. Textbook for students of psychological faculties of higher educational institutions (In 3 volumes: Vol. 2. General foundations of special pedagogy). Moscow: Academy. 352 p. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Narushevich, V. V., & Fedorov, А. В. (2000). On the issue of the need to introduce distance education among children with disabilities and young people with disabilities in St. Petersburg. Higher education of disabled people. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference, April 12, 2000, Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen (pp. 34–36). St. Petersburg: Expert. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Shchegortsev, V. A. (Ed.) (1998). Organization of vocational guidance and vocational consulting work. Educational and methodological manual. Moscow. 145 p. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Bogdanova, T. G., Huseynova, A. A., & Nazarova, N. M. (2016). Pedagogy of inclusive education (edited by N. M. Nazarova). Moscow. 335 p. (Higher education: Bachelor’s degree). (In Russ.).
10.
10. Bayramov, V. D., & Orekhovskaya, N. A. (Comp.) (2016). Professional orientation of disabled people and persons with disabilities in the system of multilevel education: organizational and methodological aspects. Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference, Moscow, November 18, 2016, Moscow State University of Humanities and Economics. Moscow: MGGEU. 847 p. (In Russ.).
11.
11. The GARANT system (2020). Letter of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated March 19, 2020 № GD-39/04 «On the submission of guidelines for the implementation of educational programs using e-learning and distance learning technologies» [Electronic resource]. (In Russ.). Retrieved from https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/73674537/ (accessed 10.17.2020).
12.
12. SPS “Contour.Standard” (2014). Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation dated August 4, 2014 № 515 «On approval of guidelines on the list of recommended types of labor and professional activities of disabled people, taking into account impaired functions and limitations of their life activity» [Electronic resource]. (In Russ.). Retrieved from https://normativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=385017 (accessed: 09.10.2014).
13.
13. SPS “ConsultantPlus” (2012). Federal Law dated December 29, 2012 № 273-FZ «On Education in the Russian Federation» [Electronic resource]. (In Russ.). Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed: 10.17.2020).
14.
14. Chvojka, M., Mlynarcik, L., & Schmiedt, P. (2009). Progr. zlievaren. technol. a metallurgy. Konf., ZlataIdka, p. 84 (May 29–31, 2009).
15.
15. Guseynova, A. A., & Manuilova, V. V. (2020). Organizational and methodological aspects of distance learning for children with special educational needs [Electronic resource]. SHS Web of Conf. Vol. 87, 2020. International Scientific and Practical Conference «Teacher Professionalism: Psychological and Pedagogical Support of a Successful Career» (ICTP 2020). Retrieved from https://www.shs-confe ences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2020/15/shsconf_ictp2020_00042/shsconf_ictp2020_00042.html (accessed: 23.12.2020).